Property Reports

A property report is the full analysis of one specific home at its own shareable URL. Reports live under /property-reports/<slug> and are the thing you send to a partner, an agent, or yourself-for-later when a listing is worth a closer look.

What's on a report

Reports are dense by design — a lot of data, organized top to bottom.

• Header. The property address, city/state/ZIP, creation date, an "N days remaining" countdown (reports expire after 30 days for data freshness), and share controls for copying the link or posting to social.
• The RAAM score. A single 0–100 score at the top, large and colored by band (80+ green, 60–79 light green, 40–59 amber, below 40 red). This is the score relative to the profile that generated the report.
• Property facts. Price, beds, baths, living area, lot, year built.
• Listing links. One-click out to Zillow or Redfin if you want photos or agent contact.
• Highlights and concerns. Two short lists — strongest positives in green, biggest red flags in amber.
• Factor breakdown. Each of the seven factors scored individually, with its weight in the overall. See Methodology for what each factor measures.
• Affordability overlay. A quick read on monthly cost vs. income assumptions.
• Community-shared layer. If the report was generated against a shared public profile, the weights that produced the score are visible.
• Extras. An emoji reaction strip, an invite-to-agent button, a QR code for sharing in person, and an opt-in "Roast This House" button — click it and the page drops in a witty, factor-by-factor commentary on the property for a lighter read.

How to read the score

Score bands follow the site-wide 80 / 60 / 40 thresholds:

• 80+ — strong fit. Worth acting on.
• 60–79 — solid. Compare against alternatives in a Comparison Report.
• 40–59 — mixed. Read the highlights and concerns carefully before proceeding.
• Below 40 — not a match for the profile that scored it.

A worked example

You receive a property report URL from your partner: 123 Example St in Newton, MA. Score 74, bands "solid." The highlights call out top-decile schools and a 15-minute commute; the concerns flag Value for Money below average for the neighborhood. Factor breakdown confirms School Quality at 89 and Value for Money at 52. The interpretation: "the house fits our priorities if we're willing to pay a premium for the schools; it's not a value play." That framing is what reports give you — not a verdict, but a specific, sharable read.

What a report isn't

• It isn't an appraisal. The price signal only affects Value for Money. Get a professional appraisal before making an offer.
• It isn't an inspection. The Condition & Systems factor uses age and typical-for-the-market signals; it doesn't replace a physical inspection.
• It isn't a recommendation to buy. It's a structured fit summary against your priorities.

Sharing and expiration

• URLs are stable and shareable for 30 days from creation. After that the page shows an "expired" notice to prevent stale data from misleading anyone.
• Re-generating the report after expiration produces a fresh URL. The old URL does not auto-refresh.
• Privacy. The profile that scored the report is not exposed in the URL unless the user intentionally shared a community profile.

Related

• Methodology — what each factor measures
• Comparison Reports — side-by-side between multiple reports
• Shared Analysis Links — the compact one-property card alternative to a full report

Last reviewed: 2026-04-14